Key Events in the Byju's Insolvency Saga
Present Day
- New evidence continues to emerge about the coordinated attack on Byju's
- Multiple whistleblowers come forward with damning evidence
- IRP's confession to IBBI corroborates whistleblower allegations
- 50,000 families face financial ruin while foreign lenders attempt to seize control of Indian assets
October-November 2024
- Legal battles escalate across multiple forums including NCLT, NCLAT, Supreme Court
- EY resigns but orchestrates appointment of Shailendra Ajmera from same team
- 50,000 employees continue without salaries while India's premier EdTech company deteriorates
September 1-3, 2024
- IRP reclassifies GLAS claim as "contingent" and ABFL as operational creditor
- Reconstitutes CoC with InCred as sole legitimate financial creditor
- GLAS immediately files application seeking IRP's replacement
August 26-30, 2024
- ICICI Bank confirms having no claim against Byju's
- IRP obtains independent legal opinions from former High Court judges
- Justice Sudhir Kumar Katriar opinion concludes: "GLAS does not hold an outstanding claim as on date"
- Justice M.G. Gaikwad opinion concludes: "ABFL cannot be termed as financial creditor"
August 18-21, 2024
- EY reappointed with "commercials kept open as per their standard billing norms"
- IRP admits: "EY IPE deputes about 5-7 persons from their various outstation location to come to Undersigned's office around 12.00 PM and started the work of drafting the IA for constitution of CoC"
- CoC hastily constituted with GLAS (99.41%), ABFL (0.41%), InCred (0.18%), ICICI (0.00%)
August 14-17, 2024
- Supreme Court stays NCLAT order, effectively reviving insolvency proceedings
- BCCI submits Form FA for withdrawal of insolvency petition
- Srivastava, under EY influence, does not file withdrawal application within required timeframe
August 2, 2024
- NCLAT formally accepts settlement, setting aside CIRP admission order
- IRP demits office and terminates professional engagements
- GLAS immediately challenges NCLAT order in Supreme Court
July 31, 2024
- Byju Raveendran settles ₹158 crore debt with BCCI in full
- NCLAT orally directs IRP not to constitute CoC considering settlement
July 23-25, 2024
- Srivastava surrenders control of official IRP email to EY team
- EY arranges legal representation for IRP through Pooja Mahajan
- IRP confesses: "In one of the instances wherein Ms. Pooja Mahajan was representing as RP Counsel stood before the Hon'ble NCLAT without having vakalath from the Undersigned"
July 20, 2024
- EY submits fraudulent disclosure claiming "NIL" relationships despite documented prior work
- EY agrees to drastically reduced fees of ₹3 lakh/month compared to PWC's ₹18 lakh/month quote
- Whistleblower: "EY seemed desperate to get the assignment and were willing to negotiate the professional fee"
July 17-18, 2024
- Srivastava pressured to engage EY despite having previously worked with PWC
- IRP admits: "They further insisted if I did not cooperate for appointing EY as IPE, they shall malign my image as an Insolvency Professional"
July 16, 2024
- Think & Learn (Byju's) admitted into insolvency based on BCCI's ₹158 crore claim
- Pankaj Srivastava appointed as Interim Resolution Professional
January 2024
- GLAS pre-selects Dinkar Venkatasubramanian as Resolution Professional in their Section 7 application
- IRP confirms: "GLAS, an agent representing Lenders had also filed an application C.P. (IB) No. 55/BB/2024 under Section 7 of the Code before the AA"
October 2022
- Evidence shows EY begins working with GLAS on matters related to Byju's offshore debt
Contact Information
Media Inquiries: media@justiceforbyjus.com
Legal Assistance: legal@justiceforbyjus.com
Employee Support: support@justiceforbyjus.com
Whistleblower Information: secure@justiceforbyjus.com
Disclaimer
The information presented on this website is based on documents and testimony from multiple sources, including a whistleblower from Ernst & Young and statements made by the Interim Resolution Professional to regulatory authorities. While we believe these materials to be authentic and accurate, we present them as allegations that merit thorough investigation. Names of individuals and organizations are mentioned because they appear in the evidence provided.
Privacy Policy
We respect your privacy. Information submitted through contact forms is kept confidential and used only for the purpose for which it was provided. Whistleblower information is treated with the highest level of security.